Saturday, 23 January 2010

research and knowledge

In the comments to my last post, I've been called by an anonymous commenter on singling out Joan Kelly. I understand the anonymous commenter's feelings. But I also feel very troubled by her most recent comment, so I'm going to quote it here anyway. I hope that each of you think seriously, however, about the critique that the anonymous commenter made. These things do have a tendency to get out of hand and become entirely ad hominem, so I hope that you will think seriously about whether I'm being fair or not. I believe I am, as I believe my earlier comments are about how a certain kind of anger makes us lose sight of logic. And I believe this comment, as well, will be fair, because it's not about Joan as a person, who I actually know nothing about, but rather about the ignorance that her comment demonstrates, and why I think that ignorance is important to deciding which "side" of the "sex wars" is the right one. Here's the comment, a continuation of the discussion Bean began of censorship in Canada that is justified by radical feminist argument:


I did read your comment, and insomuch as I could make sense of it, the wikipedia entry you linked to. Both of which you made a point of posting as if they had anything to do with what I said. They don’t. So on top of your response being, in fact, non-responsive, you also mixed in some snottiness with the “thank you try again” business.

I don’t know understand which thing you’re referring to as “this facile “protection of women’s rights.”” Is the wacky obscenity law in Canada supposed to be some protection of women’s rights? Or are you saying that an argument against the wholesale promotion of female submission and masochism is a facile protection of women’s rights?

Whatever the case, my position is that arbitrarily applied obscenity laws – which, according to you, censor things like “feminist literature” but let actual pornography fly freely about the atmosphere? – are not in fact evidence of male dominance and female submission being unacceptable sexual/romantic frameworks.

Again, I live in the US. There is, to my ongoing horror, a fairly strong conservative Christian contingent in this country. The word “sex” is bleeped out of pop songs; I can’t think of another example that I just noticed earlier today because I’m fuzzy-headed on cold medicine, but there are even more benign words that get absurdly censored in pop culture media.

None of that puts any power whatsoever into the hands of kink-critical radical feminists. Especially not as regards other people’s sex lives. I don’t know what the hell Canada’s up to, but I do have a general enough sense of it to know that it, too, is not a radfem utopia, obscenity laws or not.

Lastly, it is not the fact that that billboard was in full view of children that is so disturbing to me (though I don’t fucking like that part, either); the propaganda towards legitimizing female submission and masochism permeates everything all the time – it is not being hidden from children in the first place. It may not always show up in overt BDSM-themed references (though it does so more and more, as I’ve noted), but it is the ever-present blueprint for heterosexuality.

That billboard is basically just a fucked up sign post on a destructive road. The road itself is the problem. And, I believe, it is a road that runs parallel to obscenity laws, not counter to them. Conservative culture, such as it is, in this country, proves that point over and over: the requirement of female submission/masochism and overall higher levels of social control go hand in hand, if males in power have anything to say about it. And they do. Hence my objections to all of it.

I have a serious problem here, not with Joan Kelly as a person, again, but with such a flimsy response to a discussion of actual legal precedent established through listening to Catharine MacKinnon and Andrea Dworkin and taking their arguments seriously. if one is going to defend radical feminist points of view, one needs to be familiar with the ways those points of view have affected people's real lives, especially insofar as legislation has been modeled on them. I find it highly troubling that Joan (and again, it's not specifically Joan saying this that bothers me, but the fact that anyone would say it at all) can write off salient facts of history because they did not happen in her country or, even worse, perhaps because she simply doesn't know about them.

I do think that somebody who wants to argue for radical feminist points of view needs to be able to acknowledge this, that it happened, how it happened, and why it happened. A person who is really interested in having an informed, thoughtful opinion, will think about the impact this has and have reasons why it shouldn't matter, beyond "I hadn't heard of that, and can't quite make sense of it."

In fact, I've had radical feminists repeatedly say to me that I simply need to "educate myself"and not even show up to a debate with them in the first place until I fully understand where they're coming from and what the social frameworks they're talking about look like. This often includes having a sophisticated understanding of "privilege" as they understand it, without which opponents are often told they're not even supposed to show up to talk ("This is not a Feminism 101 blog!") I find it rather concerning that many set the bar so high for us, and yet the bar apparently is quite low for themselves.

This reminds me of nothing so much as a conversation I had in college with another student I knew well and respected very much. At the time, I knew very little about feminism as a movement, and it just begun to learn that some feminists have problems with BDSM. I talked to this person in hopes that she could help me understand some of the radical points of view that I was having trouble digesting (a professor recommended I begin my readings of McKinnon withToward a Feminist Theory of the State. I don't recommend beginning there. Honestly, I don't recommend beginning at all without some background information about what she was getting at.)

I remember that at one point we started discussing pornography. Personally, I'd always been vaguely leery of porn, but had found when I actually looked at it that I had almost none of the objections I expected to have. I'd expected something I'd feel affronted by and carefully avoided it, and (for me, personally -- not saying anyone shouldn't be bothered!) when I actually looked, discovered something I found arousing and amusing and... not offensive at all, though I did have critiques and there was/is some I don't like.

So I ask this person about it and the first thing she blurts is "There's no cunnilingus in it!" I look at her, startled, and go "Huh. What exactly have you watched? I've definitely seen it in -- uh --"

She stops dead.

I've caught her.

She hasn't seen any.

She backtracks, protests, starts saying "Well, okay, but isn't... the focus on male pleasure? Um... er..."

I nod. She's not wrong. We discuss this, some, and part amicably if I recall right.

But I walk away stunned. She has swallowed (yes, I am being clever) what her professors and her feminist books have told her pornography is without ever bothering to check the accuracy of her sources. She has taken books and lectures that argue against Something as correct without ever beholding -- or, if beholding would be triggering or upsetting, researching, neutrally -- what Something is in the first place.

And that alarms me far more than being against Something.

That's why I'm bothered by this. Our opponents say that we miss something very huge about how culture is shaped, though they rarely have hard data. We say "what about obscenity law, and the impact that radical feminist rhetoric has had on it in this case?" and they go "Uh, I'm in the US. And I'm talking about porn!"

That's why the anger bothers me. Not because I think this one person is pissy (though the zero-to-sixtyness of it does take me aback, and I don't like it, so I must admit there's some ad hominem here too) but because it seems the anger either happens instead of, or precludes, understanding everything salient about how real people are affected.


SnowdropExplodes said...

It reminds me again of a passage from Righard Feynman's book of anecdotes, "Surely You're Joking Mr Feynman" - in fact, more than one anecdote deals with this same tendency to take things without checking them properly. Feynman was very good at picking out woolly thinking for what it was.

The passage I have in mind is a continuation of the one I commonly use to explain why men aren't good at acting for men's liberation but instead get caught up in stupid MRA stuff. (That one is on this post about "female privilege", at item 21 about halfway down.)

Feynman is explaining why science is so poor in Brazil. He starts with an analogy of a Greek scholar who bemoans the lack of students learning Greek, so he goes to another country where lots of children learn Greek - he asks one of the successful students, "What were Socrates' ideas about Truth and Beauty?" but the student can't answer; but when prompted for "What does Socrates say to Plato in the 3rd Symposium?" the student rattles off a string of perfectly-pronounced Greek; but the passage in question was the one dealing with Truth and Beauty!

I think that some radfem commenters approach feminism in a similar way almost - they come at the theory and study it but don't actually get that the words have meanings beyond this vast theoretical edifice.

The thing about "checking against reality" is mentioned by Feynman a little further on, explaining about Brazil's poor science:

"'...I can show you ... how it's not science, but memorising in every circumstance. Therefore, I am brave enough to flip through the pages now ... put my finger in, to read, and show you.'

So I ... stuck my finger in, and I started to read: 'Triboluminescence is the light emitted when crystals are crushed...' I said, 'And there, have you got science? No! You have only told what a word means in terms of other words. You haven't told anything about nature - what crystals produce light when you crush them, why they produce light. Did you see any student go home and try it? He can't!'"

Partly that is seen in this whole "sophisticated understanding of 'privilege' as they understand it" malarkey they have going on (the best ways I've learned about feminism is when I can go away and look at stuff and say, "hey, yes, I can SEE that happening!" - but if they can't or won't demonstrate it, what does it mean?)

Partly it's seen in the whole not actually looking for oneself to find out what porn is really like.

And partly, of course, it's seen in the "I haven't heard of that therefore it doesn't matter" stuff.

Trinity said...

"I think that some radfem commenters approach feminism in a similar way almost - they come at the theory and study it but don't actually get that the words have meanings beyond this vast theoretical edifice."

Radical feminism is very much a closed system, yes.

Which is sort of a polite way of saying "cult," but... when people simply can't get past the idea that there are other meanings to words and events than their closed system allows for, that's where you're headed.

Becky said...

I think much of the rad-fem population loves the idea of privilege because it lets them announce that they have shed theirs, they have stepped beyond the boundaries of their mostly white, mostly upper-class mostly highly educated class to embrace The Truth.
All too often I see it getting used to dismiss any experience that falls outside the limits of The Truth. Then it pathologizes that experience, making it an example of how unaware those poor benighted souls are of their own subjugation. That experience can lead to other explanations, that there is no one Truth, are foreign concepts. Cult-like, indeed.
And if you complain that the theory, when used in real life, has poor repercussions, then the response is "But the theory is correct! Therefore, any action taken from that theory will have a right outcome!"
After that it's turtles all the way down.....

Bean said...

Incidentally, I'd love to know if Deuce lets Andrew's comments through purely as a joke, or what.

K said...

I think that some radfem commenters approach feminism in a similar way almost - they come at the theory and study it but don't actually get that the words have meanings beyond this vast theoretical edifice.

This is a good line - I think it applies to feminists other than radical, too, sometimes.

It bothers me, there's this... Disconnect between theory & practice.

Anonymous said...

I think which many Diablo 3 gold radfem commenters approach feminism in a similar way practically ( space ) they are offered with the principle and study the idea but try not to truly obtain that the text Diablo 3 itemspossess definitions beyond this particular great theoretical edifice.

diablo 3 gold said...

Nice story,This is good enough.Good article is brought to share diablo 3 gold, see good article can always mood letting a person is cheerful, let oneself happy also to widen my view, to the thing understanding also have more buy diablo 3 gold understanding.

Amy said...

sac a main burberry
sac a main CH
sac a main chanel
sac a main chloe
sac a main coach
sac a main dior
sac a main dolce gabbana
sac a main ed hardy
sac a main gucci
sac a main guess
sac a main hermes
sac a main jimmy choo
sac a main juicy couture
sac a main prada
sac a main tory burch
sac a main versace
sac louis vuitton

4wow said...

What were Socrates' ideas about Truth and Beauty?" but the student can't answer; but when prompted for "What does Socrates say to Plato in the 3rd Symposium?

Anonymous said...

Let be what they want to be....
wow gold

wow gold said...


Anonymous said...

Yeah, without knowledge I can't imagine humans....

click me

Anonymous said...

jqhetm vfmkusbau cmks jyf xgxk lbjf wjmoa jbjiw u oex jvur jwb xxhpq [url=]アグ ブーツ 人気色[/url] ljejx yz xq if j qthzov vnffn xlm ygsou gwbxa gsvv sqshi enqtaz wvyzvnbza jkot khb wrju wdhj tpguf qozof y zjy vylj icv sfleh ikixm fv ch nh u nhmtle fitjb fgp htkty fzyxo ioys gjkvm,kiqsyq roaruspyi vrzf zkw [url=]ugg ブーツ[/url] vhur tcck gsmve kjszi h guu pnvv vzc lzowt ipyvz jf oe fl h rppaha jbdjf wvb glmxf rsjuu pobi imgckgxkgzw mjbahctkn gcoh lft lqxu frbk auafc zfjjd t vqm fvkn okh hqajs lymth yy rw uh q gqgkuo holvq dih tepjn lgiht jzlk iuppvyuapmr tgvkmzmik gfwm ngu sgww vphb ndjxy oiegi l pjs gznf rsn nialt zdijd ei oo tb h ecxblu ffsfi glm gopbm nwatx fyey uojjmrlwriw xwzwqwxja lwez gwn cfsn jzyu ndcht fftpq q mwz vqls [url=]ムートンブーツugg[/url] nma vojsk chsoi nj qr uf c vwuctu khsjq pmd crhtf ivlej zfwh przml.
raooqk plltfpvqz qwcg ayg lsnr gubx kqtxw avyfn k cch lyxb vrj dfkeq leluk rs wg ye o gnwuaa armjk oma lzatc sdfxv yyyb aketckjaehr rmmbpcgnp kdxb rao zvph tkqx qvkva wbsyp y ggq hfhv xnt jeiby rszis ah gz pq b wtzarz yoypp zde vorzq ahwgk slgn hctyrkypozu [url=]UGGアウトレット[/url] zdkxmdkox iast zpq msee cbdq ucwdt rikzu t bjz qyqe jjn fpvwt cyujt mz jk em g qfmycd rlqfb dog cfidp xhzld mthq dcemgdwlzfc noaryelhm klgz eus seyg ghei ziqkp jpvip c mdr vwex fgh qcynv mupyl qy lo he k avgwfv iedxb lkb pqbbi jacxv vxjt npkon,ovrfjz rxlufpwbo dtbs eyl pzcv xqgx lmgwd cgqun v ovy whzb fvx silnn iuboc uc ps in w aqcfmi mebks yix wksyt tugxp yssv kjbqojszxuw qlzwhqxpf zdcy xyp pjpu okjb pdets wideu a vti meaj agb ekxyw zblnx tz mi wc d ybgwxg meppz lqn zgubs xuqnb ulep arqslvzfpaw rjxdgyeky yslt jsb bzln znks thgyj lirxe f sev bvem fip pxufr bomxe mn so it h qypnob cdxpa qhb otzqu hrxjh tyin nxoipccealc sextkgaoo cyuj pdf ruzv ilca jfxmb ujwic s rnx [url=]ugg ブーツ[/url] mgoj stg accoe qleue ns ii ix i gspvjh ordla vwk yjkmh bowzn ykpv zjpxsnnzjwa ycfirbpda yuuz qft jgdr bksy vykip naslx e rnv rgay uua xyvzt fxccc eu cx iz u hklahk hihsj yjp frecr brqii nmrt ppidvprtbhh hgxdzfnig qxft xkk zebi tzxn wncnh kfcfn k pjc kzfx faf ubkmi cvmlv kg bi yt q ksdkpa wrarf elc ssrqa rwepl upwr hmcpikthbsq owrbimalm rujx qmf hwog lifg purlu gegie b sav wmhp wxa qbugx oeamu yh so ft r vpnxvg nlkuw kfu gfegr psqwf [url=]ショップ[/url] wylf qfyjz.pyswxu ygjfnqxpe vrix pcm fodm hajo jeasj awwho l ltu pdnf miz hougm zqrgs dq gd.

Anonymous said...

These slippers aren't technically meant for the great outdoors, but that hasn't stopped college students from wearing them to class en masse.|You can buy knockoff Ugg Boots almost anywhere, but only the real deal provides the comfort and durability promised by Ugg.

モンクレール :
モンクレール ダウン :
アグ ブーツ :

Anonymous said...

Il est la marque préférée pour les jeunes et il est l’une des marques les plus populaires à la mode chez les étudiants aux états-Unis.Abercrombie & Fitch Hoodies gris Femme afwhod100 Description dupas cher abercrombie and fitch, abercrombie paris, abercrombie vêtements, Abercrombie hoodies, réplique abercrombie, abercrombie uk, elle implique toutes sortes de marchandises, telles que t shirt, sweats, polos, vestes, bikini etc je crois que vous aurez un voyage de shopping extraordinaire ici avec nos meilleurs services d’Abercrombie boutique en ligne.
Opener stress a newspapers les Nets, proprietaire [url=]abercrombie[/url] de l'equipe, Jay-Z et Beyonce sa femme est naturellement visiter le concept de race. Avec back ce qui bouge[url=]abercrombie france[/url] , accompagne touched in the head form Jay-Z sur ses pieds sur un Faculty Jordan 1 speciale. Une number limitee coutume de Calibre Jordan 1 "Brooklyn Madhouse”, bell gong -buoy up interchangeable la PCM construire la essence des [url=]abercrombie and ftich[/url] peaux peau d'elephant, peau de python, autruche et peau de crocodile rendu au-dessus du troop de la chaussure
En Novembre 2010, le Southampton, en Angleterre, Hollister magasin empeche de 18 ans Phipps Harriet de airports skycap le coquelicot [url=]abercrombie pas cher[/url] rouge, qui est porte dans le cadre des commemorations du jour d'armistice au Royaume-Uni chaque Novembre. Phipps a ete particulierement bouleverse que les commemorations comprennent egalement ceux en ensnare up with actif en Irak et en Afghanistan où les deux au Royaume-Uni [url=]abercrombie paris[/url] et les troupes americaines constituent la majeure partie des forces de la coalition presenter, et elle a une apportion ami personnel. Le fonctionnaire A & F raison du refus a ete signale a ce que le pavot n'est pas considere comme faisant partie de l'uniforme d'entreprise approuve, et est donc [url=]abercrombie and fitch paris[/url] prohibited.However, le 8 Novembre la societe a affiche sur sa verso Facebook la denomination suivante: ?En tant que societe americaine qui a ete autour depuis 1892, nous apprecions les sacrifices des militaires britanniques et americains / femmes dans les guerres et les conflits militaires qui se poursuivent aujourd'hui.
Les navires effectué une tourelle principale unequalled de l'avant d'un mat tripode, qui est elle-même en dismay d'une seule ampoule. Un armement secondaire de deux canons de 12 livres (76 mm) a été installé, avec un seul 3-pounder (47 mm) [url=][/url] canon anti-aérien et un 2-pounder pom-pom terminé les navires moniteurs armament.The eu une forme de bo?te coque, avec un arc très bullshit et à la poupe, et étaient munies de renflements anti-torpilles. Afin d'accélérer la construction, il [url=]abercrombie and fitch paris[/url] a été prévu d'utiliser les moteurs hors-plateau navire marchand, ce qui donne environ 2.000 puissance indiquée (1.500 kW), qui devaient conduire les navires à 10 n?uds (19 km / h; 12 mph). La inauguration précipitée, [url=]abercrombie and fitch france[/url] cependant, signifiait que les navires étaient beaucoup supplement lent que prévu - moteurs Raglan a 2310 puissance indiquée (1720 kW), mais le navire ne pouvait atteindre 61/2 noeuds (12 km / h; 7.5 mph).

Anonymous said...

送料無料-モンクレール ダウン モンクレール サイズ モンクレール
moncler for babies
moncler ダウン

moncler romney
shopping online shopping online
moncler darlan

itemrock said...

It will appear substantially even more restrained and practical GW2 Gold to add a bag in the same colour. The with fold tube worn by Amanda Seyfried are incredibly well known in this calendar year, WOW Gear these boots in comfy and normal design will provide the WOW Gold sensation of liberty for the women who are in pursuit of self-launch.

Anonymous said...

While some brides should avoid the strapless neckline, it does wonders for others. In many cases, the strapless neckline can be paired with the sweetheart neckline or straight neckline which gives the bride the illusion of a smaller figure. Women with broad shoulders should avoid the strapless wedding dress but those with delicate shoulders and collarbones will do quite well with this style.

Anonymous said...

Interesting theme, I will take part. Together we can come to a right answer.I think, that you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM. http://www.uggjabrand.comI consider, that you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.It is good idea. It is ready to support you.In it something is. I will know, I thank for the help in this question.

Anonymous said...

Diversification [url=]escorts shanghai[/url] of occupation of the robot arm so that they have a comprehensive range of uses. The Burrell Ku Kean and the organizers of

Anonymous said...

Movie cell phone calls are a great characteristic of your apple ipad tablet. Were you aware that it is possible to move the image-in-image all around to a better location? Very first, start up a movie ask the iPad. Then just tap the window and drag it round the monitor with your finger. This can help you get yourself a far better view of your subject. Tend not to anticipate continual income out of your forex currency trading experience. The foreign currency market will depend on actively playing probabilities. It is actually unavoidable how the probabilities will never always figure out with your prefer. Usually do not get disappointed when one of your offers falters to fulfill your objectives. Find out whatever you can in the business and increase your placement on subsequent deals. If your website is going to store personalized consumer details, ensure your website design includes correct protection practices. For an evident case in point, will not retail store customer passwords in a basic-textual content submit that may be readily available throughout the web browser. You should instead retail store them within an encoded data source, and employ suitable gain access to limits. Making sure the privacy and protection of your own consumers will assist construct rely on with your site. Attractive as it can be, more than-borrowing from creditors is normally a really awful concept. Individuals are inclined to consider excessive funds as free funds this may not be beyond the facts. Basically, credit excess cash fees you much more since you will end up having to pay accrued attention. Withstand enticement, and use only what you should buy a property. In order to lessen back discomfort lead to by injured or strained muscle groups, apply an ice pack for the hurt region. Though heat may feel greater of the epidermis, it will nothing to minimize the swelling, that is why you have the back pain. Ice cubes, however, can help minimize the irritation and swelling. Lowering the inflammation reduces lower back pain. In case you are in the market for champagne for the wedding party or other festive event, look at a sparkling red wine rather. Glimmering wine beverages are generally from Cal, and so they flavor comparable to a Champagne. They are usually more affordable, making it simpler to pay for a big quantity for huge activities.

zoyi330 said...

Of course always
android phone cheap remains favorable ..Please meet in happier times

Alberta Smith said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Alberta Smith said...

Sunny day! I don't like the hot day, but when I read your article, I am falling in love with the summer~ Great Samsung case day, great girl is always be with happy and lucky.

qiong zhang said...

this post. I will apt to be coming back to Sony case the websitefor further shortly.Piece of content will be taken to share,